Legal Opinion

Byrd v. Mortenson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 31, 1983No. 45A83PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

The questions presented by this appeal are (1) whether the trial judge properly refused to set aside the entries of default and (2) whether it was error for the trial judge to deny defendants’ motion for additional time to file answer.

Rule 55(d) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure provides that the trial court may set aside an entry of default “for good cause shown.” G.S. 1A-1, Rule 55(d). The determination of whether an adequate basis exists for setting aside the entry of default rests in the sound discretion of the trial judge. Frye v. Wiles, 33 N.C. App.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crotts v. Camel Pawn Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Howell Ex Rel. Howell v. HaliburtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Frye v. WilesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Henry v. DeenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. CottonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Harris v. MareadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. RC ASSOCIATES v. Regency Ventures, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Beard v. PembaurCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API