Legal Opinion

Werner Transportation Co. v. Barts

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1973No. 111, 112PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The jury’s verdict was based upon testimony that indicated that, at the time of the accident, Barts was either stopped on the highway or proceeding at a very low speed, that his headlights were either not burning at all or were extremely dim, and that the taillights were not functioning.

The trial judge instructed that:

“A safety statute provides that no person shall operate a vehicle upon a highway during hours of darkness unless • all headlamps, tail lamps, and clearance lamps with which such vehicle is required to be equipped are lighted, and are reasonably clean and in proper working order…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bentzler v. BraunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Olson v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Ernst v. GreenwaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Seitz v. SeitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sabinasz v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Nietfeldt v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Purchal v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  4. Purchal v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API