Legal Opinion

Bentzler v. Braun

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1967PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.

Should court have directed a verdict in favor of Braun and his insurer?

This court on appeal is obligated to consider the evidence from a viewpoint most favorable to the respondent. 1 As so viewed, we conclude that it was not error to refuse to direct a verdict in favor of Braun and his insurer. We have stated:

“In ruling on a motion for a directed verdict the trial court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party moved against and apply the following rule:
“ ‘ “A verdict may properly be directed only when the evidence gives rise to no dispute as to the material issues or…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ballard v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Rusch v. Sentinel-News Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Strahlendorf v. Walgreen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Lafferty v. WattleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Statz v. PohlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. Scott v. RizzoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Spier v. BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Grandstaff v. HawksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  5. Waterson v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API