Legal Opinion
Bentzler v. Braun
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided April 11, 1967PublishedCited by 117 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.
Should court have directed a verdict in favor of Braun and his insurer?
This court on appeal is obligated to consider the evidence from a viewpoint most favorable to the respondent. 1 As so viewed, we conclude that it was not error to refuse to direct a verdict in favor of Braun and his insurer. We have stated:
“In ruling on a motion for a directed verdict the trial court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party moved against and apply the following rule:
“ ‘ “A verdict may properly be directed only when the evidence gives rise to no dispute as to the material issues or…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ballard v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Rusch v. Sentinel-News Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Strahlendorf v. Walgreen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Lafferty v. WattleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- Statz v. PohlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Scott v. RizzoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- Spier v. BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Grandstaff v. HawksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Waterson v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.