Olson v. Milwaukee Automobile Insurance

It is the well-recognized rule that when a jury’s findings are attacked, particularly when they have had the trial court’s approval, our inquiry is limited to the issue whether there is any credible evidence that, under any reasonable view, supports such findings. With the rule in mind we consider that it is necessary to recite only the testimony which supports the jury’s findings. Some of it is in dispute, *110but as to the disputed testimony we must recognize that it was for the jury to determine where the truth lies.

Yoshell attacks the refusal of the trial court to change the jury’s answers…