Legal Opinion

Nietfeldt v. American Mutual Liability Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1975No. 265PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

The issues presented on this appeal are:

1. Was there any credible evidence to support the jury verdict?

2. Did the trial court abuse its discretion in denying the motion for a new trial on the grounds of newly discovered evidence ?

3. Should a new trial be granted in the interest of justice?

4. Did the trial court abuse its discretion in finding the jury’s award of damages excessive?

Sufficiency of evidence.

The defendants argue that the plaintiff’s explanation of the manner in which he sustained his injury is incredible and in the absence of credible evidence no speculation as to the actual cause…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Powers v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. John Mohr & Sons, Inc. v. JahnkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Zweifel v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Herchelroth v. MaharWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Teasdale v. TeasdaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chart Ex Rel. Sommer v. General Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Peot v. FerraroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Sabinasz v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Chart Ex Rel. Sommer v. General Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API