Ernst v. Greenwald
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
Was a letter from an employee of the state highway commission to plaintiffs attorney, stating that flashing signals were used at the time of the accident, properly admitted in evidence?
The plaintiff called as a witness Gordon Mueller, an accident traffic engineer employed by the state highway commission. He identified plaintiff’s Exhibit 2 as a letter from the plaintiff’s counsel to the state highway commission requesting information in regard to how the traffic signals were being operated at the intersection at the time of the accident. He also identified plaintiff’s Exhibit 1, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Firkus v. RombalskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Hanz Trucking, Inc. v. Harris Brothers Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Smith v. Atco Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Creamery Package Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Zenner v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Jagmin v. Simonds Abrasive Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Household Utilities, Inc. v. Andrews Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Phelps v. Physicians InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Valiga v. National Food Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Johnson v. Misericordia Community HospitalCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.