Seitz v. Seitz

Plaintiff seeks a new trial on the following grounds:(1) The apportionment of negligence is contrary to the evidence.(2) The trial court permitted improper cross-examination of plaintiff’s husband.(3) The trial court abused its discretion in permitting defendants to amend their answer during the course of trial.(4) The trial court erroneously excluded certain medical bills.(5) The trial court committed error in instructing the jury.(6) The damages awarded are so inadequate as to indicate passion and prejudice on the part of the jury.(7) The bailiff wrongfully communicated with the jury.(8) In…