Legal Opinion

Wells v. Lloyd

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1942No. L. A. No. 18418PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

— The present appeal is the third in this action. On the first a judgment for plaintiff entered upon a directed verdict was reversed on the ground that issues other than that pertaining to damages should have been submitted to the jury. (Wells v. Lloyd, 6 Cal.2d 70 [56 P.2d 517].) On the second appeal a judgment of nonsuit was reversed by the District Court of Appeal, which held that the evidence produced at the second trial was substantially the same as that presented at the first trial, that this court had decided upon the first appeal that there was sufficient evidence in favor of…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Douglas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Tally v. GanahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Pierce v. United Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1911

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. People v. DailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Gordon v. Aztec Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Pellett v. Sonotone Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Zuckerman v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API