Tally v. Ganahl
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court, and in the opinion in Tally v. Parsons, 131 Cal. 516.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
In the case of Tally v. Parsons, 131 Cal. 516, [63 Pac. 833], the judgment was reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. The sole appellant in that ease was J. G. Ganahl, the appellant here. When the case reached the superior court after a reversal the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the action without prejudice to a new action, and judgment of dismissal was entered accordingly. Thereupon he began the present action against Ganahl alone, upon the same bond as that sued on in the former action. Judgment in the present action was given in favor of the plaintiff. The present…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
- Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Wixson v. DevineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Portland Trust Co. v. CoulterOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Tally v. ParsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Nally v. Grace Community ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. ShueyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.