Legal Opinion

Zuckerman v. Underwriters at Lloyd's

California Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1954No. L. A. 22668PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Upon trial of the action brought by the beneficiaries under two accident insurance policies upon the life of George H. Francis, a jury returned verdicts in favor of the insurer. As grounds for reversal of the judgment denying recovery, it is contended that certain instructions to the jury were prejudicially erroneous.

One of the policies sued upon insured the life of Francis in the amount of $100,000 for the benefit of the law firm of *464which he was a member. A second policy for $75,000 provided that the insurance should be payable to the law firm and to James H. Francis, his brother.

The answer…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. New York Life Insurance v. GamerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Brooks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Matter of Connelly v. Hunt Furniture Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Butigan v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercuy Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Aydin Corp. v. First State InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API