Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Supreme Council of the Royal Arcanum

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to set aside verdict and for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

The' defendant is a fraternal corporation, created under the laws of the State of Massachusetts. One *254Frank Z. Wilcox was one of its members. As such he held a benefit certificate payable to the plaintiff at his death, provided that, at that time, he was a member in good standing in the order. This action is brought to recover the amount of such certificate.

In December, 1905, proceedings, regular upon their face, were begun, which resulted in the expulsion of Mr. Wilcox upon charges which, if true, amply justified such action. The tendency of these charges was to bring the order itself into…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Forest Coal Co. v. DoolittleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Stockwell v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. North Bloomfield Gravel Mining Co. v. KeyserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Foot v. . StilesNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. Smith v. NelsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1846

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCoy v. HandlinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State ex rel. Granite Investment Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Dorsey v. Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API