Legal Opinion
McCoy v. Handlin
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1915No. File No. 3812PublishedCited by 47 opinions
Application for a writ of mandamus by James H. McCoy against J. E. Handlin, as State Auditor.
1Per curiam
Chapter 239, Daws 1911, provides:
“That whenever a judge of the' Supreme Court whose legal residence shall be at some place other than the state capital shall have changed his place of actual residence to the capital, there shall be paid to such judge in consideration of expenses incident to removal to the capital, the increased expenses of living at a place other than his legal residence, the expenses of traveling to and from such legal residence the fixed sum of fifty dollars for each month payable upon the certified vouchers of such judge filed in the office of the state auditor.”
This law,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Oakley v. . AspinwallNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Matter of RyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- State ex rel. Barnard v. Board of EducationWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Pearce v. AtwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Atkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Todd v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- State ex rel. Payne v. ReevesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
- Manning, Commissioner of Finance v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.