Legal Opinion

Forest Coal Co. v. Doolittle

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1903PublishedCited by 49 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Cabell County. Writ of prohibition applied for by the Forrest Coal Company against E. S. Doolittle, Judge, et al.

1Opinion of the Court

PoeeeNBARGee, Judge:

A writ of prohibition has been applied for by The Forest Coal Company and others, to prevent the Honorable Edward S. Doolittle, judge of the circuit court of Cabell County, from •sitting further in a chancery cause, pending in said court, on the ground that he is disqualified as to that case, by reason of his interest in the subject matter thereof. This raises two questions, the first of which is, whether, if such disqualification exists, the writ lies, and "the other, whether the judge has any disqualifying interest.

The authorities almost uniformly hold that when a judge…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Matter of RyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. State ex rel. Barnard v. Board of EducationWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Bourland v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Merritt v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. North Bloomfield Gravel Mining Co. v. KeyserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Brotherton v. BlankenshipWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Stern Bros., Inc. v. McClureWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State Ex Rel. Riffle v. RansonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Holt v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Wilcox v. Supreme Council of Royal ArcanumNew York Court of Appeals · 1914

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API