Bashore v. Mooney
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County, and from an order denying a new trial. H. Z. Austin, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Action to quiet title to a certain water ditch known as the Zumwalt Extension of the Tulare Irrigation Company’s Ditch, and the right of way therefor. Two of the three original plaintiffs conveyed to the third, after the complaint was filed, and the latter filed a supplemental and amended complaint as sole plaintiff in the case. There were numerous defendants, as to some of whom the court found that they had no interest in the ditch; as to others the court found that they had a certain interest therein; as to • the defendant Tulare Irrigation Company it was found that it was the owner of said…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Unger v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Smith v. O'haraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Humphreys v. BlasingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Abbott v. PondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Churchill v. LouieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Murphy v. KerrDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1923
- McShane v. QuillinIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Roberts v. QuisenberrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Pierce v. FontenelleNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
- Crawford v. LambertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.