Unger v. Mooney
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Thornton J.
This is an action to recover possession of an undivided half of a lot of land situate in the city and county of San Francisco, to which the Statute of Limitations was pleaded. The court held against the defendants on this plea, and judgment passed for plaintiff. The defendants moved for a new trial, which was denied. One of the grounds on which t-hic motion was denied was the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding on the issue joined on the plea of the statute above mentioned.
The findings of fact, so far as they are adverted to or necessary to be remarked on herein,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Blight's Lessee v. RochesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
- Green v. LiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1814
- Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts v. Town of PawletSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Barr v. Gratz's HeirsSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Lessee of Clarke v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1831
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Johns v. ScobieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Montecito Valley Water Co. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Alhambra Addition Water Co. v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Thomas v. EnglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.