Legal Opinion

Abbott v. Pond

California Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1904No. L.A. No. 1211PublishedCited by 18 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County and from an order denying a new trial. Prank P. Oster, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGray, J.

This action was brought to enjoin defendants from discharging waste water upon the land of plaintiff.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment in defendants’ favor and from an order denying plaintiff a new trial.

1. The plaintiff objected to the defendants introducing any evidence of a prescriptive use or right to discharge their waste waters across the land of plaintiff, upon the ground that the facts set up in the answer “do not constitute a defense by way of prescriptive right or easement as claimed in the answer.” This is in the nature of a demurrer to the answer. It is claimed that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Thomas v. EnglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Humphreys v. BlasingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Sinnett v. WerelusIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Hays v. De AtleyMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Conaway v. ToogoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Gurnsey v. Antelope Creek & Red Bluff Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API