Humphreys v. Blasingame
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.-
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
Plaintiff is the owner of about five acres of land upon which he resides, and is also the owner of one hundred and sixty acres separated from the residence parcel by intervening lands of the defendant, over which the plaintiff claims a right of way between his two parcels. The defendant having denied the plaintiff’s right and closed up the way, this action is brought to establish plaintiff’s right, and to recover damages, and for an injunction. The cause was tried *41by the court without a jury, and the plaintiff had findings and judgment, and the defendant appeals from the judgment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thomas v. EnglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Hanson v. McCueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Lakeside Ditch Co. v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by20 opinions
- O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Hester v. SawyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Sinnett v. WerelusIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
- Conaway v. ToogoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Gurnsey v. Antelope Creek & Red Bluff Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.