Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Kerr

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided December 20, 1923No. 942PublishedCited by 34 opinions

In Equity. Suit by William E. Murphy, receiver of the Carlsbad Eight & Power Company, against Cesarino A. Kerr.

1Opinion of the Court

PHIEEIPS, District Judge.

This is a suit brought by the plaintiff against the defendant to quiet the title to a tract of land situated in Eddy county, N. M., consisting oí a hydroelectric power plant, with dam, reservoir, power house, and real estate used in connection therewith, which is more particularly described in the bill herein.

Defendant filed an answer and cross-complaint, in which she alleges that she is the owner of an easement in the real estate described in plaintiff’s bill, or right to have water carried from and through the irrigation works situated on the real estate described…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Strickler v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  3. Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Coffin v. Left Hand Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  5. Nevada Ditch Co. v. BennettOregon Supreme Court · 1896

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Nevada v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Ickes v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Nebraska v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Ronzio v. Denver & R. G. W. R.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  5. State Ex Rel. Bliss v. DorityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API