Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Fontenelle

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1952No. 33182PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

Plaintiff commenced this action to partition described farm lands, alleging that he was and had been the owner in fee simple of an undivided one-ninth interest therein since July 14, 1939. Defendants included the sole heirs at law of Eugene Fontenelle who died January 12, 1944, the executors of his estate, and The Federal Land Bank of Omaha, which at all times here involved concededly had a first mortgage on the premises.

Thereafter Gerald B. Eagleton, hereinafter called intervener, filed a motion in such action seeking permission to intervene upon the ground that he was the owner of the land…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Armor v. FreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  2. Pahl v. SpragueNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Western Smelting & Refining Co. v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Kellner v. WhaleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Foree v. StubbsNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Hendricksen's EstateNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Terry Carpenter, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Fox v. FoxWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Nathan v. McKernanNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Weesner v. WeesnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API