In Re Kelso
California Supreme Court
WRIT of Habeas Corpus to the Sheriff of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
Petitioner seeks his discharge from the custody of the sheriff of the city and county of San Francisco, by whom he is held under a commitment issued upon a judgment pronounced against him upon conviction of a violation of an ordinance of said city and county.
The prohibitory portion of said ordinance is as follows, viz.: “No person, company or association shall maintain or operate any rock or stone quarry within that portion of the city and county of San Francisco bounded as follows:” Then follows a description of a large portion of such city.
The complaint filed against petitioner simply…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ParksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Ex Parte DickeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by48 opinions
- Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Wheeler v. GreggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- West Bros. Brick Co. v. City of AlexandriaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
- Pacific Palisades Ass'n v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Ex Parte HadacheckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.