Ex Parte Dickey
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
By this writ the petitioner attacks the constitutionality of an act of the legislature defining the duties and liabilities of employment agents, making a violation of the act a misdemeanor, and fixing penalties therefor (Stats. 1903, p. 14), and in particular section 4 of this act, under which he was charged with and convicted of misdemeanor.
Section 4 reads as follows: “It shall be unlawful for an employment agent in the state of California to receive, directly or indirectly for registration made or for information or assistance such as is described in section 2 hereof, any money or other…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Frisbie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Ex parte JentzschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Millett v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
- Ex parte NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Ribnik v. McBrideSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Wallace v. ZinmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- In Re KelsoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- People v. HolderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.