Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Dockal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 22, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 3, 2006 and January 5, 2006, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

In August 2004, claimant’s employment as a truck driver for Eastern Freightways, Inc. was terminated for misconduct after it was discovered that claimant had falsified his employment application. Claimant then began employment with Metal Transportation Systems, Inc. and was subsequently terminated for misconduct after he violated the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of DzabaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re the Claim of DesirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. In re the Claim of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. In re the Claim of DurandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re the Claim of ElsayedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. In re the Claim of SilvermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API