Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 5, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 18, 2004, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from her employment with a temporary placement agency after the employer discovered that claimant failed to disclose on her employment application in response to a bold-print question that she had been convicted of a felony. Notwithstanding claimant’s contention that her failure to answer the question was inadvertent due to a lack of time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of NapolitanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re the Claim of ClassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re the Claim of ReddenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of DockalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. In re the Claim of ElsayedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API