Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Durand

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 5, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 5, 2001, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from her employment as an auto retailer after she failed to follow proper procedure in not securing an auto part during transport. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she was terminated due to misconduct, and we affirm. It is well settled that knowingly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. In re the Claim of SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of DockalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API