Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Elsayed

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 6, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

Claimant was employed as the assistant director of housekeeping for the employer for approximately 20 months. He was discharged in August 2004 after the employer discovered that claimant had failed to identify his most recent employer on his employment application. Claimant’s subsequent application for unemployment insurance benefits was ultimately denied by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board on the basis that he lost his employment as a result of disqualifying misconduct. Claimant now appeals.

We affirm. The employment application specifically provides that any misrepresentation made by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of DockalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. In re the Claim of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API