Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Desir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 18, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal *905from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 20, 2001, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from his employment as a financial consultant after the employer discovered that claimant had falsely represented on his employment application that he had not previously worked for the employer. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant’s knowing misrepresentation on his employment application constituted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of ClassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re the Claim of VastaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Claim of MerardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of DockalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. In re the Claim of MearsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of OberferstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API