Legal Opinion

LaChance v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 29, 1988No. 640-87CPublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:

This action came before this court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint under RUSCC 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendant sought dismissal of plaintiff’s claims because plaintiff grounded his complaint in noncompensable constitutional provisions and because plaintiff had previously pursued his claim by way of administrative forfeiture. Plaintiff responded to defendant’s motion by asserting that, regardless of the administrative forfeiture process, this court had jurisdiction because the seizure of plaintiff’s property lacked…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. The United States v. Patrick J. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  2. United States v. Norman Ray WoodallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  3. Marshall Leasing, Inc., a Washington Corporation v. United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Froudi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  5. Jumah v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API