Legal Opinion
Marshall Leasing, Inc., a Washington Corporation v. United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 1, 1990No. 87-4344PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellant contends that the district court erred in dismissing its action on the grounds that the complaint did not state an equitable claim as required for a waiver of sovereign immunity under 5 U.S.C. § 702 and that appellant had an adequate remedy at law in the Claims Court under the Tucker Act. We find that appellant’s complaint sought equitable relief. We reverse the district court’s finding that appellant had an adequate remedy at law as to its first three claims alleging a denial of due process under the fifth amendment, and af.firm as to the fourth alleging a…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- United States v. MarolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Andre Lopez Polanco v. U.S. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. GiraldoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Jorge Sarit and Dennie Espaillat v. U.S. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Norman Ray WoodallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.