Legal Opinion
Jumah v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 23, 2009No. 08-862CPublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
This ease comes before the court on the motion of the defendant, the United States (“government”), to dismiss the claims brought by the plaintiff, Amin Jumah (“Mr. Jumah”), for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). Mr. Jumah claims that the government owes him payment for information he provided to the Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”2) in April 2003. He also alleges various tort and *605Constitutional claims. For the reasons that follow, the government’s…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Vargas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Mendez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Snyder & Associates Aquisitions LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.