Legal Opinion
Stephenson v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 15, 2003No. 03-616 TPublishedCited by 129 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REGINALD W. GIBSON, Senior Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs have come before this court pro se to request the enumerated relief from alleged constitutional due process and equal protection violations, as well as various civil rights claims. While we find that this court lacks the requisite power and authority to adjudicate plaintiffs’ claims herein, on the other hand, we do not rule that plaintiffs are without a cause of action in a different tribunal, to wit, the U.S. district court. Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is therefore GRANTED.
II.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- Matthews v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- McCullough v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Pikulin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Bussie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Woodson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.