Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Papapietro
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 9, 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 2, 2005, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he received a reasonable assurance of continued employment.
During the 2004-2005 academic year, claimant worked for the Rochester City School District as a per diem substitute teacher for a total of 109 days and earned $14,740. On June 20, 2005, the district sent claimant a letter assuring him of continued employment as a per diem substitute teacher for the 2005-2006 academic year with expected earnings of not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re the Claim of MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of MakisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of CortorrealAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of PapapietroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Claim of LincolnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of JeantyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of MarinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Matter of Papapietro (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017