Snohomish River Boom Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Black, J., entered February 13, 1909, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action for damages.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
The respondent brought this action to recover the sum of $1,987.97, as compensation for expenses incurred in handling logs and reconstructing a logging boom, made necessary by the building of a new bridge by the defendant. This bridge was constructed across the plaintiff’s boom, and interfered therewith. The action was tried to the court without a jury, findings of fact were made, and a judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff for $1,371,75. The defendant has appealed.
The court made findings which were separately stated and numbered, and were to the effect that the plaintiff was a cor*694por…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Horrell v. California, Oregon & Washington Homebuilders' Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Hutchinson v. Mt. Vernon Water & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
- Hannegan v. RothWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Peters v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Smith v. GlennWashington Supreme Court · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nicholson v. NearyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Opitz v. HaydenWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Sallaske v. FletcherWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Mowbray v. SimonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Johnson v. S. L. Savidge, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.