Legal Opinion

Nicholson v. Neary

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1914No. 11153PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Webster, J., entered February 11, 1913, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action on a promissory note, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

Respondent gave a note payable to the order of appellant and for his accommodation. Later appellant sent the note to his attorneys at Spokane for collection. Respondent was unable to pay, and upon request of the attorneys and to prevent a present action, he gave a new note for the amount due on the first noté. This action was brought on the second note. Respondent answered denying consideration. After hearing the testimony, judgment was rendered in favor of respondent. Appellant was not present at the trial, nor was he a witness in his own behalf, although the court offered to adjourn the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Peters v. LohrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Sanford v. Royal InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Scarpelli v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Hutchinson v. Mt. Vernon Water & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Snohomish River Boom Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Stumpf v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Snyder v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. City Street Improvement Co. v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. In Re Newell's Estate &8212 Newell v. BradleyUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Gainsburg v. GarbarskyWashington Supreme Court · 1930

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API