Legal Opinion

Horrell v. California, Oregon & Washington Homebuilders' Ass'n

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1905No. 5861PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered March 4, 1905, upon findings in favor of tire plaintiff after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to cancel contracts of a foreign building and loan association, and recover payments made thereon.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, J.

On or about the 1st day of July, 1902, the plaintiff was the owner of three contracts in the Western Home Building Association, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of this state, by the terms of which he agreed to pay said association the sum of $2.50 per month on each contract. The general plan on which the business of the association was conducted is not material on this apipeal. On the above date the plaintiff entered into an agreement with the defendant herein, whereby the plaintiff ae*534cepted three contracts in the defendant association, of like character, in lien of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dearborn Foundry Co. v. AugustineWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. La France Fire Engine Co. v. Town of Mt. VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Peters v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Wright v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Way v. Pacific Lumber & Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Model Heating Co. v. MagaritySupreme Court of Delaware · 1911
  4. Fender v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Snohomish River Boom Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API