Legal Opinion

Hannegan v. Roth

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1895No. 1584PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Whatcom County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, J.

J.— This action was brought to obtain a decree declaring the respondents to be the owners in fee simple; as tenants in common, of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of section 28, township 38, of range 3 east, in Whatcom county; and that the defendants have no right, title or interest in or to the same.

The plaintiffs. allege and claim title under mesne conveyances, and by operation of law, from one Emma F. Doyle, the grantee from the United States. The defendants deny plaintiffs’ title, and set up adverse possession, and also…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rice v. StevensWashington Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Katterhagen v. MeisterWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Prince v. PrinceWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. In Re Ivers' EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Peters v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Fender v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1909

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API