Legal Opinion

Smith v. Glenn

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1905No. 5531PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered July 30, 1904, upon findings in favor of tbe plaintiffs, after a trial on tbe merits before tbe court without a jury, in an action to rescind a contract for tbe purchase of lands.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

Respondents instituted this action to rescind a contract for tbe purchase of certain farming lands from appellants, and to recover $500 paid on account of said contract. Rrom a judgment in favor of respondents, this appeal is prosecuted. Appellants appear in this court by different counsel than represented them in tbe trial court.

Respondents move to strike tbe statement of facts upon two grounds: (1) Because said statement is not indexed; (2) because said statement does not contain all of tbe evidence. Tbe index to tbe statement has been prepared by tbe clerk of this court and attached at tbe…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hannegan v. RothWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Peters v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Bringgold v. BringgoldWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Lilly v. EklundWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Schlotfeldt v. BullWashington Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Bankers Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Northern Life Insurance v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Fender v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Snohomish River Boom Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Berens v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API