Peters v. Lewis
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J\, entered May 19, 1903, upon findings of the court and an advisory verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendants, dismissing an action to enjoin the flow of drainage, and awarding the defendants $100 damages upon a counterclaim for the removal of lateral support.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
This cause was once before in this court on appeal. Peters v. Lewis, 28 Wash. 366, 68 Pac. 869. The complaint alleged damages by reason of drainage from the defendants’ adjoining premises. Relief by way of injunction was sought against a continuance of the drainage, and also recovery for accrued damage. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained by the trial court, and this court directed that it be overruled on the ground that the allegations were broad enough to include drainage of a collected and sewage character.
Upon the return of the cause to the superior court, the demurrer was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Parke v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Hannegan v. RothWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Peters v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Cook v. TibbalsWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- City of Montesano v. BlairWashington Supreme Court · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Wong Kee Jun v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Wright v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Farnandis v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
- King County v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
- Horrell v. California, Oregon & Washington Homebuilders' Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1905
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.