Legal Opinion
Rhodes v. US Bank National Ass'n
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 27, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-5135PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Rufe, District Judge.
Plaintiff has filed suit alleging that Defendants, U.S. Bank, N.A. and KML Law Group, P.C. (“KML”), violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”)1 in connection with a foreclosure action brought in Pennsylvania state court based on a mortgage on Plaintiffs property. U.S. Bank had been assigned the mortgage; KML represented U.S. Bank in the staté court action. Defendants have moved to dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint. For the following reasons, the motions will be granted.
I. FACTS ALLEGED
Although the Amended Complaint contains much that is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Ala, Inc. v. Ccair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Deanna Turner v. Crawford Square Apartments Iii, L.P. McCormack Baron Management Services, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Balent v. City of Wilkes-BarreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Walker v. Phelan Hallinan Diamond & JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- AHMED v. WEST COAST SERVICING INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- SHAW v. HAYT, HAYT & LANDAU, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021