Legal Opinion

Balent v. City of Wilkes-Barre

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 1995PublishedCited by 169 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MONTEMURO, Justice.

The City of Wilkes-Barre (City) appeals from the order of the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania (Pellegrini, J., dissenting), dated September 22, 1994, affirming the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County, dated June 9, 1993, which denied the City’s motion for post-trial relief and affirmed a jury verdict of $30,000.00 in favor of Joseph J. Balent and George Barto (Owners).

On appeal, the City contends that 1) the Owners’ claim is barred under the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, as the City’s liability for the razing of the Owners’…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. In Re Condemnation by the Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Urbanic v. RosenfeldCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Balent v. City of Wilkes-BarreCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by169 opinions

  1. Deanna Turner v. Crawford Square Apartments Iii, L.P. McCormack Baron Management Services, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  2. Witkowski v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. LambertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Stewart Merritts, Jr. v. Leslie RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023
  5. J.S. Ex Rel. H.S. v. Bethlehem Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API