Legal Opinion

Deanna Turner v. Crawford Square Apartments Iii, L.P. McCormack Baron Management Services, Inc

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 31, 2006No. 05-1979PublishedCited by 179 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes on before the court on appeal by plaintiff Deanna Turner from an order of the district court entered March 22, 2005, granting summary judgment in favor of Crawford Square Apartments III, L.P. (“Crawford Square”) and McCormack Baron Management Services, Inc. (“McCormack Baron”) (sometimes together called “defendants”). The district court concluded that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine barred Turner’s complaint alleging violations of Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (the “Fair Housing Act” or “FHA”).

On appeal, we first considér…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by179 opinions

  1. Great Western Mining & Mineral Co. v. Fox Rothschild LLPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  2. Lazaridis v. WehmerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  3. Marra v. Philadelphia Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  4. Banks v. County of AlleghenyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Erie Insurance Exchange v. Erie Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013

174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API