Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ESCHBACH, Circuit Judge.
Essentially two questions are presented by this appeal: (1) whether the district court erred in dismissing the plaintiffs’ antitrust complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and (2) whether the district court erred in refusing to allow the plaintiffs leave to amend. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the judgment of the district court on both issues.
I
A
The factual allegations of the complaint, which we must assume are true in considering the propriety of a dismissal for failure to state a claim, are as follows:
Car Carriers, Inc.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,249 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Runnion Ex Rel. Rsunnion v. Girl Scouts of Greater ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Frederico v. Home DepotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Frazier v. State of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
1,244 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.