Legal Opinion
Allard v. Liberty Oil Equipment Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 25, 2000No. SC 16154PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether a defendant sued in negligence may apportion liability to a product seller against whom the defendant alleges, in its apportionment complaint, only a theory of negligence. The defendant, Liberty Oil Equipment Company, Inc. (Liberty Oil),1 appeals2 from the judgment of the *789trial court striking its apportionment complaint against the third party defendant, Boston Steel and Manufacturing Co. (Boston Steel). Liberty Oil claims that the trial court improperly struck its apportionment complaint because, although Boston Steel was alleged to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Daily v. New Britain Machine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Lynn v. Haybuster Manufacturing, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Winslow v. Lewis-Shepard, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. DabkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Gazo v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Craig v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Ganim v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Lostritto v. Community Action Agency of New Haven, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Hurley v. Heart Physicians, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.