Legal Opinion

State v. Dabkowski

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 18, 1986No. 11342PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.

After a trial to the jury on a two count information, the defendant was found guilty of sexual assault in the first degree, in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70, and guilty of unlawful restraint in the first degree, in violation of General Statutes § 53a-95.1 This appeal followed.

On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court erred (1) in admitting certain hearsay statements under the constancy of accusation doctrine because the “current breadth” of the hearsay exception which allows such testimony both as to the facts and contents of that accusation is no longer justified because…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Ballard v. Superior Court of San Diego CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. MastropetreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. State v. OuelletteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. The PEOPLE v. GloverIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. DemosWashington Supreme Court · 1980

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. State v. TroupeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. State v. PollittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API