Ganim v. Smith & Wesson Corp.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The dispositive issue of this appeal is whether the plaintiffs, a Connecticut municipality and *316its mayor, have standing to assert the various causes of action that they have alleged against the defendants, who are various firearms manufacturers, trade associations and retail sellers.1 The plaintiffs, the city of Bridgeport and its mayor, Joseph P. Ganim, in his official *317capacity, appeal* 2 from the judgment of the trial court granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss their claims for lack of standing. The plaintiffs claim that they have standing: (1) under General Statutes §…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Maximo HILAO, Class Plaintiffs, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ESTATE OF Ferdinand MARCOS, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- William Barnes v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- City of Chicago v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
- Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- City of New York v. Smokes-Spirits.Com, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- District of Columbia v. Beretta, U.S.A., Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.