Daily v. New Britain Machine Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtSantaniello, J.
This is an appeal from a decision of the trial court granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a products liability action. The plaintiffs claim that the trial court erred: (1) in granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment when there existed genuine issues of material fact; (2) by failing to recognize the plaintiffs’ right to assert a common law cause of action; (3) in refusing to permit the plaintiffs to amend their substitute complaint and reply to special defenses to allege false misrepresentation and fraudulent concealment claims against the defendant; and (4) in…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by169 opinions
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Denny v. Ford Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.