Legal Opinion

Gonzales v. R. J. Novick Construction Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1978No. L.A. 30829PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MANUEL, J.

Cross-defendant Vienna Stonecraft, Inc., appeals from an adverse judgment on a cross-complaint for indemnity. We affirm.

Plaintiff Ben C. Gonzales brought the instant action against R. J. Novick Construction Company, Inc. (Novick), a general contractor, and others seeking damages for personal injuries suffered by him when he fell from a scaffold while acting in the course and scope of his employment as a brick tender for Vienna Stonecraft, Inc. (Vienna), a subcontractor of Novick. Novick cross-complained against Vienna for indemnity. The trial was trifurcated, the issue of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Rossmoor Sanitation, Inc. v. Pylon, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
  3. American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Cahill Bros., Inc. v. Clementina Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. In re the Estate of BurdickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Bay Development, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Rodriguez v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Mountain Fuel Supply Co. v. EmersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Smoketree-Lake Murray, Ltd. v. Mills Concrete Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Bear Creek Planning Committee v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API