Legal Opinion
Ullrich v. Newburg Township Board
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 6, 2002No. C1-02-565PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.
FACTS
Respondent Helmut J. Ullrich petitioned appellant Newburg Township Board for the establishment of a cartway under Minn.Stat. § 164.08 (2000). On December 1, 2001, appellant denied respondent’s petition to establish a cartway to his property. Respondent challenged the denial of the petition in a mandamus proceeding in district court. See Horton v. Township of Helen, 624 N.W.2d 591, 594 (Minn.App.2001) (holding that a petition for writ of mandamus is appropriate to appeal a township’s denial of a petition to establish a cartway pursuant to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McIntosh v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Schaust v. TOWN BD. OF HOLLYWOOD TP., CARVER CTY.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Boldt v. St. Cloud Milk Producers' Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Independent School District v. City of White Bear LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- State ex rel. Casmey v. TealSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Waite Park v. Minnesota Office of Administrative HearingsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- City of Wyoming v. Minnesota Office of Administrative HearingsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Tokvan Ly v. Jodi Harpstead, Minnesota Commissioner of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024