Legal Opinion
City of Waite Park v. Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 16, 2008No. A07-2438PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
This matter was previously appealed to this court after the district court granted mandamus compelling appellant Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) to allow annexation of certain land by respondent City of Waite Park (city). We affirmed that decision without remanding to the district court, and there was no petition for further review. City of Waite Park v. Minn. Office of Admin. Hearings, No. A05-1888 (Minn.App. July 18, 2006). OAH promptly ordered the annexation of the property in compliance with this court’s opinion. Two months after this court’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mumm v. MornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Spaeth v. City of PlymouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Mattson v. Underwriters at Lloyds of LondonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Kellar v. Von HoltumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Nationwide Corp. v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- C & O Motors, Inc. v. West Virginia Paving, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
- Johnson v. Princeton Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017