Legal Opinion
McIntosh v. Davis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 2, 1989No. C7-88-2586, C3-88-2620PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Chief Justice.
This matter involves a review of orders for writs of mandamus issued by the court of appeals requiring the petitioner judges to schedule defendants’ trials within the 60-day time limit provided in Minn.R.Crim. P. 11.10. Trials for both respondents were scheduled beyond the 60-day time limit under a comprehensive criminal calendering plan, commonly called the “blitz.” It was implemented during January and February 1989 by the Hennepin County District Court in an effort to reduce the backlog of criminal cases. In the order granting review, this court directed the parties…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Elzie v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- United States v. Vernon Edwards, United States of America v. Robert E. McCoyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Gale Gordon FreyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Ramon Azurin Gregorio Araneta v. William Von Raab, in His Capacity as Commissioner of Customs of the United States Customs ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. v. City of MinnetristaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. WindishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. PeroSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.