Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Casmey v. Teal

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 22, 1898No. Nos. 11,087-(33)PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Polk county, Ives, J., directing the issue of a peremptory writ of mandamus compelling him, as clerk of school district No. 218, Polk county, to approve the bond of relator as treasurer of the district.

1Opinion of the CourtMitohell, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court directing the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandamus compelling the respondent, as clerk of the school district, to approve the proffered official bond of the relator as treasurer of the district.

1. Such an order is appealable. State v. Churchill, 15 Minn. 369 (455); State v. Webber, 31 Minn. 211, 17 N. W. 339.

2. The statute provides that

“The treasurer of each district shall execute a bond to the district, in double the amount of money, as near as can be ascertained, which will come into his hands as treasurer during his term, with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Davis v. ShanksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
  2. State ex rel. Matthews v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. State ex rel. Coffey v. ChittendenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  3. State Ex Rel. Klimek v. School District No. 70Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. State Ex Rel. Laurisch v. PohlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. State ex rel. Landon v. AndingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API